Own Deposition Scheduling Voice Coordinator.

What you'd own.

Every artifact below transfers to your accounts on day one. The whole engine.

• ●Deposition Scheduling Voice Coordinator brand identity and messaging framework
• ●Agent design spec with multi-party call orchestration logic
• ●Landing page and sales collateral targeting litigation firms
• ●Financial model showing $168K mid-year 1 ARR trajectory
• ●Direct outbound email campaign playbook for attorney firm targeting
• ●Production roadmap prioritizing recording consent and compliance features
• ●Founder persona and initial customer discovery findings

What Roll Digital builds for you.

Custom scope to take Deposition Scheduling Voice Coordinator from MVP shell to operating business.

• ▸Production backend API on FastAPI with Postgres for call management
• ▸State-specific recording consent handling and legal compliance framework integration
• ▸Multi-tenant auth with email and Google sign-in support
• ▸Stripe billing integration with per-firm monthly subscription management
• ▸Call recording, transcription, and secure storage with encryption
• ▸Integrations with Planet Depos and Veritext court reporting APIs
• ▸Admin dashboard for firm oversight of scheduled depositions
• ▸Customer success program supporting 30-day post-launch onboarding and training

Why this could work.

Legal firms spend $4K annually on deposition coordination. A $350/month tool addresses real pain: manual calls across multiple parties (opposing counsel, reporters, videographers, deponents). The GTM is direct and targeted: 50-200 attorney firms with 10+ depositions monthly feel scheduling friction acutely. Early adopters at mid-size firms could generate $168K ARR if adoption reaches 40 firms. Voice automation removes administrative overhead, and the legal market increasingly adopts tech solutions for cost control.

What you'd risk.

Two-party recording consent laws vary by state; a tool that records calls without proper disclosure triggers wiretapping liability and malpractice exposure. Attorneys avoid vendors that create legal risk. Getting opposing counsel, reporters, videographers, and deponents to adopt an unconsented AI system is a friction wall. Court reporting agencies already control scheduling relationships and may disintermediate an AI layer. Legal sales cycles span 6-9 months, severely constraining year-1 pipeline. Success probability sits at 12%.

Who this fits.

This fits a founder with existing relationships in litigation or legal tech. You need B2B SaaS sales experience, comfort navigating state recording laws and compliance, and capital to sustain a 6-9 month sales cycle. A solo operator with a law firm network or an ex-legal tech founder rebuilding solo works well. You should expect year-one loss of $24K and a 12% success probability going in.

Timeline.

From contract signing to operating business.

1. Day 1
   Receive codebase, agent spec, financial model, outreach playbooks
2. Week 1
   Deploy state compliance framework and multi-tenant auth system
3. Week 3
   Integrate Stripe billing and court reporting agency APIs
4. Week 6
   Launch production backend with call recording and encryption
5. Day 90
   Complete 30-day customer success support, hand off operations

Pricing.

Three ways in, depending on how much you want to build yourself.