Ship log · iter #27

Iteration 27 ship log

2026-05-10 · continued autonomous /loop

On this pageWhat shipped Files changed inventory Why this matters Status snapshot What still needs work Next 5 recommended autonomous tasks Cumulative iter 1-27

Date: 2026-05-10 (continued autonomous /loop)

What shipped

This iteration shipped two high-leverage features: a per-product objection handler on every unlock page, and a meaningful health-check expansion that catches generator regressions earlier.

New: per-product objection handler on unlock pages

Built /home/ubuntu/factory/director/objection-handler-injector.py (marker WD_OBJECTIONS_v1). Reads /srv/sites/factory/adoptability.json and injects 3 honest objections-with-answers right before the unlock CTA on every /unlock/<slug>/ page.

Selection logic:

Each objection has a 1-paragraph honest answer that points the buyer to what the dossier actually says about that concern. Tone deliberately favors honesty over hype: "Distribution is the hard part of every idea. The dossier maps a realistic first-100-customer path. If the path looks weak, that's your signal."

Injected on 187 unlock pages. Marker-bracketed for atomic re-runs. Cron 45 keeps it fresh as adoptability scores change.

Verified dynamic selection works:

New: health check expansion 34 → 53 endpoints

Added 19 new checks to /home/ubuntu/factory/director/health-check.py:

Result: 53/53 passing, avg 20ms.

This is genuinely useful: the iter 25 double-period bug + iter 26 missing-nav bug would surface within 10 min of a regression now (cron runs health check /10 *). Before: only the homepage + a few endpoints were sampled.

Em-dash discipline

Caught + cleaned 7 em-dashes I'd shipped in the new objection handler before the iteration logged complete. Final em-dash count on this-iter pages: 0.

Files changed inventory

New

Modified

Crontab

All .bak backups preserved.

Why this matters

The objection handler is at the single highest-leverage point in the funnel: the unlock page, right before the $5 CTA. A buyer who's curious but hesitating sees their actual concern named honestly and answered without hype. That's the moment where confidence either holds or breaks.

What the buyer sees now: their specific product flagged as crowded/long-build/small-upside before they pay, with a real answer about how the dossier addresses each concern. This builds the kind of trust that makes the next $99 adopt purchase feel safer too.

The health-check expansion has zero buyer-facing effect - it pays back when the next generator bug ships. Iter 25's double-period took until iter 26 to surface. Now that class of regression surfaces in ~10 min.

Status snapshot

What still needs work

Same Wes-side as before:

  1. Stripe wiring (30 min)
  2. Email-send for auto-fulfill
  3. First real traffic push
  1. Hero-polish second pass - Claude CLI on the bottom-50 Adoptability landing pages to lift quality at the bottom of the catalog.
  2. Per-product trust-signal block on builds pages - Adoptability score + honest "no live customers yet" disclosure + last-updated date, near the unlock CTA.
  3. More audience pages - "AI ideas you can launch in 30 days", "AI ideas under $5k to launch", "AI for ecommerce store operators".
  4. Per-product before/after preview - show 1 sentence of locked dossier content + 3 redacted lines, so the buyer sees concrete proof of what they get.
  5. Auto-extracted pull quotes from each dossier - surfaced on /unlock/<slug>/ as additional teaser content.

Cumulative iter 1-27

60+ buyer-facing pages, 189 products, ~1500 per-product sub-pages with consistent nav, objection handlers on 187 unlock pages, health check covering 53 endpoints. The factory's per-page UX is significantly tighter and the buyer's path from "curious" to "$5 unlock" is genuinely shorter than 5 hours ago.

← PreviousIter #26 Next →Iter #28