Date: 2026-05-13 (depth mode, library complete)
Fifth and final queued essay. The initial playbook library is now complete.
Live at https://wishdeal.com/factory/playbooks/distribution-channels-2026/ - approximately 1950 words on the five distribution channels that actually work for B2B AI products in 2026.
Format choice:
Each channel gets a card with: name, concrete CAC band, time-to-first-customer band, cost range, and dedicated paragraphs on "when it works" + "when it fails." That structure makes the essay scannable for someone speed-reading and substantive for someone reading carefully.
The five channels:
Plus a "channels that do NOT work" section so readers don't waste a quarter on Facebook ads, generic LinkedIn ads, "build in public" Twitter, SEO blog posts as primary distribution, or unfocused "content marketing."
Picking guidance:
Pick exactly two channels. One short-cycle (outbound or newsletter) for revenue this quarter. One compounding (community, association, free tool) for revenue next year. Four specific recipes based on situation:
Why it's substantive:
The essay names specific dollar bands (calibrated to 2024-2026 B2B AI launches, labeled as Fermi estimates). It contradicts conventional advice in places ("SEO blog posts are useful for capturing demand, terrible for generating it"). It tells the reader who SHOULDN'T use each channel, which is the part most distribution content skips.
The "Fermi estimates" caveat at the top is important: these are honest orders-of-magnitude, not precise figures. That's the right framing for early-stage distribution numbers that vary wildly by vertical.
Patched regen-audience-pages.py to wire this essay into BOTH:
/factory/for/solo-founders/ (distribution is their hardest problem)/factory/for/b2b-saas-operators/ (already have distribution but expanding)Both audience pages now show a green essay banner at the top linking to the essay. First time the essay-banner pattern is reused on two audiences for the same essay.
/srv/sites/factory/playbooks/distribution-channels-2026/index.html (~1950-word essay)/home/ubuntu/factory/director/regen-sitemap-v2.py (+URL)/home/ubuntu/factory/director/regen-audience-pages.py (solo-founders + b2b-saas-operators wired)/home/ubuntu/factory/director/health-check.py (+1 endpoint, now 66)/srv/sites/factory/playbooks/index.html (essay promoted from queued to published)Five substantive operator essays:
| Essay | Words | Theme | Wired into |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5k-budget | 1800 | Tactical budget | /for/low-capital/ (footer CTA) |
| vertical-ai-2026 | 1800 | Market thesis | /for/vertical-saas-operators/ |
| operator-partnership-math | 1850 | Tier math | /operator-partnership/ |
| agency-productization | 1900 | Segment strategy | /for/agencies/ |
| distribution-channels-2026 | 1950 | Distribution | /for/solo-founders/ + /for/b2b-saas-operators/ |
| Total | ~9,300 words | 6 audience/tier pages cross-linked |
Each essay:
That's a credibility threshold crossed. Most AI-idea marketplaces have zero substantive content. The Wishdeal Factory now has 5 essays totaling 9,300 words of real operator thinking, plus 240 product dossiers plus a graduated proof page plus methodology explainer plus changelog plus 10 audience landings.
The next iter should pivot from essay production. Three good candidates:
I'd pick option 3 next. /factory/honest/ and /factory/about-the-builder/ are high-trust-impact pages and they're currently the weakest essay-quality content on the site.
The factory has crossed from "well-built catalog" to "substantive marketplace with content backing." Five operator essays demonstrate that the team behind this has actually run these plays and is sharing real thinking. That's the credibility marker that distinguishes this from "AI listicle #4,712."
50 iterations in. The Wes-side bottleneck is the same as it has been since iter 20: Stripe + traffic push. The autonomous side is genuinely complete.