Ship log · iter #131

Iteration 131 ship log

2026-05-15 · push mode, 60 min cadence, performance + validity iter

On this pageWhat shipped (2 substantive ships, 1 real bug caught) Ship 1: audit-page-load-size.py - 27th audit class Ship 2: audit-html-validity-basic.py - 28th audit class /quality-report/ wired - 2 new cards + invariants #35-36 The 28 audit suites at iter 131 Health hygiene Status snapshot Iter 131 throughput note Running queue (top 5 for iter 132) Cumulative iter 1-131

Date: 2026-05-15 (push mode, 60 min cadence, performance + validity iter)

What shipped (2 substantive ships, 1 real bug caught)

Built page-load-size + html-validity-basic audits. Page size is comfortably under threshold across the catalog. HTML validity caught 1 real bug: code-review-ai has 3 missing </div> tags.

Ship 1: audit-page-load-size.py - 27th audit class

Built audit-page-load-size.py (~75 lines). For each /builds/<slug>/index.html, flags if file size exceeds 80KB (Lighthouse-aware threshold for fast first-paint on mobile networks).

Result: 247/247 clean.

Forward-looking guardrail: if a future generator regression causes bloat (excessive inline CSS, embedded base64 images, runaway template strings), this audit will catch it. Current state is comfortable.

Cron: every hour at :39

Ship 2: audit-html-validity-basic.py - 28th audit class

Built audit-html-validity-basic.py (~115 lines). Not a full DOM validator. Checks high-signal mistakes:

Result: 246/247 clean. 1 real bug caught: code-review-ai has div-imbalance (79 open vs 76 close = 3 missing </div> tags).

This is the kind of bug that would only show up as visual layout breakage when the offending page renders. Catching it via static audit means it can be fixed before a buyer lands on the broken page.

Wes-task: fix code-review-ai's missing div closers. The audit is now wired so re-running it will confirm the fix.

Cron: every hour at :41

/quality-report/ wired - 2 new cards + invariants #35-36

Patched regen-quality-report.py:

Live-check card count: 28 -> 30. Total content invariants: 34 -> 36.

The 28 audit suites at iter 131

Now grouped by class for clarity:

Catalog-wide (1): audit-fakeproof.py

Per-surface content (17): adoptability-drift, page-identity, hero-polish-drift, og-coverage, teaser-quality, case-studies-quality, faq-quality, unlock-content, adopt-content, feedback-content, pricing-content, vs-content, how-it-works-content, sales-kit-content, skeptic-memos-content, image-alt, image-src-exists

Cross-cutting (9): cross-surface-name, jsonld-coverage, meta-tags-coverage, internal-links, twitter-card, emoji-presence, cross-surface-tagline, page-load-size, html-validity-basic

Linting (1): em-dash-sweep

Health hygiene

Status snapshot

Iter 131 throughput note

2 substantive ships at 60-min cadence. One audit (page-load-size) passed cleanly as a forward-looking guardrail. The other (html-validity-basic) caught a real bug on first run. Pattern continues: each new cross-cutting audit either confirms structural soundness OR catches a thin-margin defect that wouldn't show until a buyer hit it.

Running queue (top 5 for iter 132)

  1. Wes-task: 1 HTML imbalance (code-review-ai missing </div> x3) + 19 emoji + 4 thin descriptions + 16 pricing + 8 case-studies
  2. audit-favicon-coverage - every page declares an icon?
  3. audit-cache-headers - check Caddy is sending immutable / max-age headers correctly on static assets
  4. audit-aria-roles - accessibility role coverage
  5. audit-language-attribute - every page has <html lang="en">?

Cumulative iter 1-131

The audit suite is now structurally complete enough to publish as documentation. Future iters can either focus on (a) deepening existing audits, (b) reconciling the 48 warn items via Wes-task, or (c) building higher-level cross-cutting analytics (e.g., "how does adoption-rate correlate with which surfaces a buyer touches?").

← PreviousIter #130 Next →Iter #132