Ship log · iter #120

Iteration 120 ship log

2026-05-15 · push mode, 60 min cadence, audit-hardening iter

On this pageWhat shipped (1 substantive ship) Ship 1: brand_brief_name helper extended to 3 more audits The 5 audits with brand-rename support after iter 120 Health hygiene (Op rule 5) Status snapshot Iter 120 throughput note Running queue (top 5 for iter 121) Cumulative iter 1-120

Date: 2026-05-15 (push mode, 60 min cadence, audit-hardening iter)

What shipped (1 substantive ship)

This iter applied brand-rename support preventively to 3 more audits (teaser-quality, unlock-content, adopt-content). All 3 currently 247/247 clean - the hardening is forward-looking against the contract-ai/Inkwell pattern surfacing on a different surface in the future.

Ship 1: brand_brief_name helper extended to 3 more audits

Built a single patch script applying the brand_brief_name(slug) helper to:

Approach for each: insert the helper function above audit_one(), then update the name-match logic to also accept the brand brief\'s display name (and its compacted form).

Why preventive: All 3 audits currently 247/247 clean. The brand-rename pattern (contract-ai displays as "Inkwell" on its page but adoptability.json has "Contract AI") would have false-flagged these audits if any future rebrand affected the teaser/unlock/adopt content. iter 118 surfaced the issue on FAQ audit; iter 119 added it preventively to feedback. iter 120 closes the remaining gap.

Verified: ran all 3 audits after the patch. Each still 247/247 clean. No regressions.

The 5 audits with brand-rename support after iter 120

AuditIter addedSurface
audit-faq-quality.py118/builds/<slug>/faq/
audit-case-studies-quality.py118/builds/<slug>/case-studies/
audit-feedback-content.py119/feedback/<slug>/
audit-teaser-quality.py120/dossiers/<slug>/teaser.md
audit-unlock-content.py120/unlock/<slug>/
audit-adopt-content.py120/adopt/<slug>/

Every audit that does a title or H1 name match now handles brand-rename. The class of false positive (brand brief diverges from adoptability.json name) is closed.

Health hygiene (Op rule 5)

Status snapshot

Iter 120 throughput note

1 substantive ship at 60-min cadence. Preventive hardening doesn\'t change current state but eliminates a class of future false positives. The audit suite is now genuinely robust against brand-rename drift.

Running queue (top 5 for iter 121)

  1. Audit /factory/builds/<slug>/vs/ content quality - 245 vs-comparison pages
  2. Wes-task: 8 case-studies fabrications - still the only warn state
  3. Cadence-validate 60 min
  4. Build audit-pricing-content.py for the 247 /builds/<slug>/pricing/ pages (page-identity covers, but content quality is a separate concern)
  5. 13th essay - skip until queue has fresh candidate

Cumulative iter 1-120

Audit precision is at its highest ever. False-positive classes (Fermi-context iter 88, brand-rename iter 118+120) systematically eliminated. The audit suite catches real issues, not spurious ones.

← PreviousIter #119 Next →Iter #121