# Email Drip: Code Morph (Pseudocode-to-TypeScript Translator)

Target ICP: Dev team leads, engineering managers, staff engineers at startups and mid-market companies shipping 2+ features per week.

---

## Email 1: Hook

**Subject:** Your codebase style, automated

**Body:** Most pseudocode-to-code translators flatten your team's voice. Code Morph learns it. Every accepted translation becomes context for the next, so after 5-10 uses, it writes like you—not a bot. Worth testing?

---

## Email 2: Problem

**Subject:** Re: Your codebase style, automated

**Body:** The gap between pseudocode spec and production code costs dev teams 20+ hours per feature. Your senior devs manually translate architectural notes into typed code. Code Morph closes that loop: pseudocode in, typed code out, in your exact style.

---

## Email 3: Proof

**Subject:** Live demo: 90-second code generation

**Body:** We built this for teams shipping 50+ features/year who've stopped manual translation. The payoff: pseudocode specs execute as production TypeScript without style inconsistency. See it in action. Takes 2 minutes to grok.

---

## Email 4: Scarcity

**Subject:** Limited beta: 8 spots total

**Body:** Code Morph beta is 8 teams. Each addition trains the shared model, so later adopters get faster results. If your team ships weekly feature specs, beta pricing ends May 30. First come.

---

## Email 5: Close

**Subject:** One question: are you shipping faster?

**Body:** Some teams use Code Morph to cut pseudocode-to-code time in half. Others skip it. No wrong answer. But if you ship 2+ features/week and manual translation is the bottleneck, let's talk. Reply with 'let's test' and we'll onboard this week.

---

**Voice notes:** Exacting (specific metrics, zero fluff). Adaptive (emphasizes learning and personalization). Laconic (short sentences, terse). Each email <150 words.
