# Seth LaBranche, VP of Outside Sales at Pacific Rim Medical Supply — read of Field Visit Logger iOS, June 20 2026

> 14 years running outside sales teams, currently managing 9 field reps across WA and OR on Sales Connector. Coaches 10U baseball Saturday mornings. First coffee in the car at 6:48 AM, every day.

## How I got here

Someone dropped this link in the SC Users LinkedIn group with the caption "anyone tried this?" I clicked assuming it was an iOS app I could download and hand to my reps this week. We've been using a Notes app and a Google Form for field visit logging for two years and I'm embarrassed by that every time I look at the CRM. About 30 seconds in I started realizing I had the wrong expectation for what this page was.

## What I clicked first

"one-handed use in parking lots and offices" landed. That's the exact thing. My reps log nothing because logging on mobile is either too slow or requires them to actually stop moving. That phrase made me think whoever wrote this has watched a field rep try to use a phone in a hospital lobby. The "Auto-Trigger Sales Connector Sequences" bullet also got me because that's the gap I keep complaining about: visit happens, follow-up doesn't.

## Where I paused

"Honest disclosure: we don't have live customers on this idea yet." I sat on that sentence for a minute. Not because it's alarming, actually the opposite. It's the first thing on a product page that's ever been honest with me in that way. But then I had to re-read the whole page because I realized I had been reading it as if this was something I could buy and install. It's not. This is a package for someone who wants to BUILD this product. That realization scrambled my whole read.

## What I distrusted

"$-9,700 Year-1 take-home (Fermi)" is sitting right there in the middle of the page and nobody explains what that number means until you squint. For a second I thought it was the price. Then I thought it was an annual fee. Eventually I understood it's a profit estimate for the person who BUILDS the product. That's a wild number to lead with, and "pain intensity: 4/10" right next to "buyer clarity: 10/10" creates an odd story: they know exactly who the buyer is, but they're not sure the buyer hurts enough to pay. Okay, which is it.

The "1 in 4 Meaningful-success odds" is the kind of disclosure I respect in the abstract and distrust in context. It's calibrated honesty as a marketing technique. It makes me like the brand while simultaneously telling me the thing probably won't work.

## What would convince me

I'm not the buyer for the $99 tier, I'm the buyer for the actual app. What would convince me is: show me one field rep's day before and after. Not a testimonial, not a case study. A screenshot of the Sales Connector sequence that fired after a logged visit. The notification that popped up. The commit date that showed in the deal record. One actual logged visit with the rep's actual words blurred out and the SC record visible. That's it. That's what I'd screenshot and put in a Slack message to my reps.

## What I'd ask in an email reply

1. Is there a version of this that actually exists and works right now, or is this genuinely an unbuild concept? I can't tell if "Adopt the build for $99" means I'm buying working code or a plan to write working code.
2. If someone buys the $99 tier and builds this, how does the SC integration get maintained when SC pushes API changes? Is that on the builder or is there a relationship with the SC team?
3. The Offline-First claim: does the sync handle conflict resolution when a rep logs the same visit twice (once offline, once their teammate logged it in SC)? That's the failure mode we'd hit immediately.

## Verdict: on-the-fence

The product idea is the most accurate description of a real problem I have right now. But I came in expecting to buy a tool and I'm leaving having been pitched a studio model that's one layer removed from what I actually need. If someone who bought the $99 tier shipped this and listed it on the App Store, I'd pay $30/seat without blinking. I'll bookmark this and check back in six months.

---
*Memo by skeptic persona, generated 2026-06-20. Studio breaks own self-grading loop.*